Diet Soda Bad News
As much as I love my self-imposed, five-day-a-week creative writing assignment, I’ve decided to take a few days off. While you’re all tripping out on tryptophan today, I give you this post from Thursday, October 2, 2008. Happy Thanksgiving to my US readers. Have an extra slice of that pumpkin cake for me!
About nineteen years ago I finally decided to deal with the empty calories being delivered into my body regularly in sixteen ounces doses. (Of course, back then I called it “pop” since I lived in the Midwest. But a drink by any other name would taste as sweet.)
It seemed like a good plan, but with one small problem: artificial sweeteners. If I’m allowed to quote a story about one man’s first experience with saccharine:
My first introduction to diet sodas happened a few years earlier, when I dropped a quarter into a vending machine, pressed the COKE button, and a pink can of something called TAB rolled out. I had no idea what it was (and it certainly wasn’t what I wanted) but it was a hot summer day, and I was thirsty. I popped the top, took a swig, and immediately spit it out. I couldn’t imagine what sort of people thought kerosene was a reasonable substitute for a cold beverage.
That was when I was a kid. By the time I was twenty-three, things hadn’t improved much. I still hated the taste. Of course, any right minded person would just give them up altogether, but no, I just had to drink this crap, so I kept at it and kept at it until eventually I liked it.
Fast forward to last year when the news broke, “Hear ye, hear ye! Diet Sodas Make You Fat!” What?! What the bleep are you talking about? Diet sodas are good. Diet sodas broke my empty calorie habit. It took years and years of training to finally like them—then this? You’ve got to be kidding me.
Well, here’s what happened. Apparently they put a box full of rats on a diet of saccharin and another box of rats on a diet of Super Sugar Crisp, and wouldn’t you know it, the low-calorie rats gained weight. The sugar-laden rats died, but at least they weren’t fat.
So here we go, yet another flipping paradox delivered to us from on high, just to further muddy the already turbulent waters of the diet world. Thanks. The idea (and I’ve talked about this once or twice in other posts, but I’m too lazy to look them up) is that the body tastes “sweet” but doesn’t get the actual calories it expects to receive with that taste. So it decides to make up for it by forcing you back to the kitchen a half hour later for a bowl of sugary cereal. Ergo, it’s not the artificial sweeteners, per se, causing the weight gain, but subsequent behavior down the road based on the body not getting what it was promised.
Does that mean you should quit drinking diet sodas right now? Not exactly. First, this article does a pretty good job of explaining the rat thing. Second, like all studies, they’re just talking general odds. Your mileage may (and probably will) vary. Lastly, you know yourself best. Do you eat more because you drink sodas? If so, stop it. If not, don’t worry about it.
Me, I’ll keep on drinking them. Not because they’re good (or bad) for me, but because I like them and they make me happy.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Enjoy my writing? Then don't forget to come back! I just might post something good tomorrow, too. Subscribe via RSS , via email, or share it with a friend. If you really like it, put me on your blogroll. That'd be sweet.






on November 27, 2008 at 10:10 am
um… bacon flavored diet coke? gross. lol.
on November 27, 2008 at 4:37 pm
Hmmm! Interesting Charlie. I read the same kind of thing, however, the explanation was more in the mode of your body is expecting something ’sweet’, so therefore it releases insulin to combat the ’sweet’ and as the insulin has nothing to convert, it gets stored as fat. As we know, excess insulin does this anyhow, so I thought it was quite feasible.
I wish I kept the article as it was logical enough for me to quit all artificial sweeteners. I now use xylitol as sugar and in gum. No doubt there will be some revelation about that in years to come but for now, it’s supposed to be less calorific and low glycemic…………
Tusc :o)
on November 27, 2008 at 5:23 pm
Hi,
Thanks so much for this post.Weight loss is obviously a big issue for such a huge percentage of society these days.
All the best for the future.Deshawn Stewart
All Posts by Category
Last Five Posts
Recent Comments
MarcE said, "Just think, Charlie, if you had consumed 1 less calorie per day over the past 7000 days you would weigh..."
Robin said, "Isn’t it funny how it seems we’re constantly on a diet but make very little progress?!? But..."
bobbie said, "Not sure what to say. I’ve been watching, questioning, lamenting, etc. what goes into my mouth..."
Jenn@slim-shoppin said, "If only there no fluctuations inbetween, that would be great!!"
Charlie said, "Well, “amazing” is one word for it. “Sad” is another.
Sagan said, "“it’s just what I do. It’s not a good thing; it’s not a bad thing; it just is.” I’m..."
Jess said, "I’m pretty sure I read somewhere that the average human GAINS 2 pounds a year, so good for you!"
Quix said, "Congrats on your 0 lb gain overall during 19 years.
Charlie said, "Here’s the really weird part. After I posted this, I went upstairs to take a shower and for fun..."
Biz said, "Oh my goodness Charlie!! That is too crazy - 1/2 a pound! Tony and I are starting South Beach today - his..."
Subscribe
Pages of Interest
All Rights Reserved.
No part of this site can be reproduced without written permission from the publisher.
—Disclaimer—
All content is the opinion of the author. This site is primarily for entertainment purposes only. Nothing here should be construed as sound medical advice. Charlie Hills is not actually an expert at anything. Please ignore him.