Train Header Graphic

Hand Holding

I understand that a million different diet messages can make for some confusing times out there. The diet industry has never had a problem contradicting itself at any given time about what’s good, what’s bad, and what should simply be left alone. But I think there are a few things just about everybody can universally agree on. And one of them is that the burger pictured here is “not good for you.”

It weighs four pounds, comes on an eight-inch bun, clocks in at 4,800 calories, and a dietitian is asking ballpark owners to add a warning label to this thing. Sounds pointless to me. But I guess I should remember that this is the same society that requires a “do not eat” label on printer toner.

This hand-holding annoys me greatly. I’d like to think that there’s some sort of base level of competence we can target. You know, like, if it’s obvious to a fourth grader, you’re probably okay leaving off the “never iron clothes while they are being worn” sticker.

In this particular case, the dietitian wants this burger labeled “dietary disaster” that increases the risk of cancer and heart disease.

If there’s someone out there who thinks the four pound burger is health food, then this person is obviously a candidate for the Darwin Awards.

Plus, I don’t believe this burger causes cancer and heart disease and here’s why. Let’s say studies were done that determined that falling off a cliff was harmful to your health. Then some experts concluded you should never step off a curb. If you eat diets high in calories, saturated fat, and french fries constantly, then, yes, you’re probably in trouble. But if you head out to the ballpark once every few years and for fun you go in on this burger with a few friends and split it, then, no, you’re not going to immediately leave the ballpark on a stretcher.

This is just my long-winded way of saying “moderation.” And for those who argue that a 4,800 calorie burger isn’t “moderation” then I counter-argue that “moderation” doesn’t mean, “never ever ever having any fun whatsoever again.”

Besides, splitting this burger with a couple friends is no worse than a big Thanksgiving dinner. And I don’t see anyone campaigning to slap warning labels on turkey, stuffing, and mashed potatoes. Unless, of course, the label were to read, “Warning! Do not insert food directly into nostrils.”

Celebrity Childhood Crush

The following post is an encore presentation of Back to the Fridge. It was taped before a live, studio audience, December 10, 2008. (But I did make one or two small edits, just to keep things fresh.) Anyway, hopefully I have some new visitors since then who haven’t bothered to dig that far back into the archives.

Last year at work, someone started an email thread asking, “What celebrity did you have a crush on as a child?” Meaning, what grown-up celebrity did you have a crush on when YOU were a child and not what celebrity did you have a crush on when HE or SHE was a child.

It was one of those questions that should have been easy. I mean, isn’t that just part of growing up? I’m sure I had dozens and dozens of celebrity crushes. But my poor remembery just ain’t what it used to be and I really had to wrack my brain to think of someone(s).

Of course, maybe that’s a good thing. Perhaps being able to instantly recall two dozen crushes from thirty years ago is not a feat you wish to trumpet. Anyway, it turned out to be a fun thread and I thought, why not start the same thing here amongst a slightly smaller audience? This could get interesting.

Being this post’s author, I shall begin, and I apologize in advance for all the testosterone. I won’t let it happen again.

ccc1As a child of the 70s, I just had to watch The Love Boat. It came on either just before or just after Fantasy Island and as near as I can tell, had all the exact same guest stars. While admittedly the bizarre Fantasy Island was a bit more in line with my offbeat tastes, the one thing it didn’t have was Lauren Tewes. I remember watching the show when I was thirteen or so, which is about the exact age you truly believe you can grow up and marry a TV star. Besides, she was only twelve years older. While 13 and 25 isn’t feasible, it worked out for Ashton and Demi, right?

ccc1Okay, now we’re more like twenty years apart, here. But that still didn’t matter when you’re talking about one of the coolest moms on the tube. I mean think about it, who was she up against around that time? Mrs. Cunningham? Ms. Romano? Sophia Petrillo? Although, I really can’t overlook Justine Bateman. She was pretty hot and we were the exact same age. Perhaps I should have written fan letters to her instead, and avoided all those pesky restraining orders. Ah, what would we do baby without us?

ccc1This one’s a no-brainer. In fact, I’m not even sure what to write except look at Princess Leia in the gold bikini. For those of us who grew up with her between 1977 and 1983, this scene was like suddenly seeing the girl next door on the beach in a bathing suit. I mean, you always figured she was a looker, even though you grew up right next door from her, but then to have it all laid out like this…wow. Unfortunately, Leia got dressed for the rest of the film. Fortunately, she didn’t kiss her brother again.

So there you have it, three childhood celebrity crushes. They’re not my top three, but that’s because of that memory problem I told you about earlier. If I think of what my real top three were, I’ll let you know. But don’t hold your breath.

Before wrapping this up, here are my votes in the category of Pairs of Female Television Show Stars Where The Hot One is Not Actually The Hot One:

ccc4


Now that I’ve completely dated myself, it’s your turn.

Breakfast

Don’t Forget! Today is Day Two of my Virtual Book Tour. Head on over to Peanut Butter Boy and you won’t be sorry. Well, actually, you might be. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Not too long ago, I wrote about The Four Food Groups: Italian, Mexican, Chinese, and Cheeseburgers. Someone suggested, and I had to agree, that breakfast could have easily been among these chosen few. So today I am making it official. Breakfast is now the Fifth Food Group.

Ah, but what kind of breakfast? That is an important point. Because sometimes I eat very non-breakfast foods for breakfast, and other times I love having “breakfast” at very non-breakfast times. What to do, what to do…

To keep things simple, I shall divide breakfast into two categories: sweet and not sweet.

Sweet

This is the kind of breakfast made up of pancakes, waffles, muffins, cinnamon rolls, and toast spread thick with marmalade. I would also place Golden Grahams in this category (though I could eat Golden Grahams any hour of the day any day of the week).

The best time for this kind of breakfast is after you’ve been on a low-carb diet for six months. Though, and I speak from personal experience here, make sure your pancreas is tied down and fully secured before tackling the stack o’ griddlecakes and syrup.

The best time for waffles is when you’re on the road and staying at a La Quinta with those industrial-strength waffle irons. They pre-measure the batter, keep the iron constantly hot, and the best part? They do all the cleaning. What more could one want?

Not Sweet

Potatoes. That’s what more one could want. Nice though the sweet breakfast is, for me it doesn’t compare to the “not sweet” breakfast. Eggs, bacon, sausage, aaaaaaand … POTATOES. There’s really nothing quite like a perfect batch of pan-fried taters for breakfast. Highly seasoned, and very hot, you’ve got the makin’s for a great day here, I tell ya.

The real trick is the eggs. Everybody likes their eggs done a certain way and it’s not always an easy thing getting others to understand what “right” means when it comes to egg preparation.

For me? I call it “over hard” though I’ve never really been sure if that’s the right term or not. Here’s the trick. Get the pan very hot and greased up. Drop an egg in and break the yoke. Make sure part of the yoke spills over directly onto the pan. Let it cook good and long, then flip. Now let it cook more good and more long until all traces of runniness have gone beyond recall. Salt and pepper and eat while it’s hooo-hooo-haaa-haaa-hot.

Now that’s good eatin’.

So what’s your favorite breakfast? Sweet, non-sweet, or other? Describe below.

What’s That Smell?

Why, it’s that new site smell, of course! Welcome to Back to the Fridge 3.0, everybody! Based on my own experience working with the site (as well as much feedback from others), I thought it was time to make a few changes around here.

What’s New

Here’s a quick list of changes, some interesting and some not so much:

  • Finally upgraded WordPress.
  • With that comes: comment threading and Gravitar support!
  • Back to the Fridge is now more like a regular blog.
    • The cute (but confusing) fridge on the home page is gone.
    • The last five posts now show on the index page.
    • Regular blog roll now on every page.
    • And normal “blog-like” navigation all around
  • “Return to Onederland” category retired!
  • New left-hand menu for off-site links.
  • Improved right-hand menu for on-site links.
  • And updated graphics to amaze your friends.

In short, everything is different, but it should still feel like home. Comments are most welcome! Caveat: The URL for the RSS feed has changed. If you always read BTTF via RSS, you will need to change your bookmark.

Virtual Book Tour

I implemented this makeover in conjunction with my first Virtual Book Tour. Take a look at the links on the left for all the stops over the next two weeks. Please follow me. It should be … interesting!

Magical Mystery Tour

This is my new category, replacing Return to Onederland. The first leg of this journey is behind me. It’s now time for the next part. I couldn’t think of anything that describes it better than the words magical and mystery. I should write a song.

Week 37
Starting Weight 224.0
Current Weight 196.6
Change from Last Week -1.1
Lost So Far 27.4

I’ve changed this little box too. First, I’m now counting weeks, since that’s a little easier to read than “Day 259.” Next, I removed the “Pounds to Go” because I don’t actually have an end goal. This is an open-ended journey with a destination independent of the number my scale spits out.

And speaking of that number, you know how I would always bemoan having a great week, then in one stupid day I would gain three pounds and throw off the reading for the entire week? Some people suggested I weigh myself before the weekend, so that wouldn’t happen. Of course, it doesn’t matter what day I pick: an anomalous reading can happen at any time.

To fix this, I discovered a highly complex mathematical concept called averaging. I weigh myself seven days, add those values together, and divide by seven. Wow.

And just in the nick of time. Because I had a great week this week. Until weigh in morning Sunday when I mysteriously went up 2.5 pounds. See? This “average” thing is brilliant!

Anyway, that’s about it for now. Hope you like the new site and hope you follow me on the tour. It should be fun.

Austin Burger Tour #4

Last week I asked y’all to pick the place for me. You’ll all be mad as heck to learn that Deb’s cheating actually won. She listed P. Terry’s four times in a row, thus garnering PT’s the most votes. (To be honest, I’d nearly made up my mind to go there next anyway…)

Before you actually try a P. Terry burger you first must acquire one. You have two choices: 1) command some underling of yours go get it. (This is a great way for your toddler to get some real world experience.) Or 2) get it yourself. I chose the latter.

If you’re coming to P. Terry’s from the south west, I highly recommend this easy parking plan, cuz that’s exactly what I tried and it worked. It only takes about ten minutes to run this circuit in heavy traffic:

Ignore the McSign in the background. This is a great sign.

You know what’s another good sign? Cheap food. Two bucks for the basic hamburger? Even a miser like me can live with that. Not to mention it’s refreshing to find a place that doesn’t charge an entire dollar for a single slice of American cheese:

Here’s a nice shot of the stand itself:

If burgers and fries weren’t enough for you, free dog bones for the kids!

(I wish I had a better shot of Rachel. Her shirt says FREAK.) Between us, we ordered one combo and one extra cheeseburger. Saved thirty-five cents too!

Ah… now those look like good fries!

And here’s the burger itself. That patty looks pretty thin. Maybe that’s not a good sign. Plus, I’ve never seen the meat on top and the condiments below. Interesting…

Along with a closeup, for the discerning readers:

Austin Burger Tour #4
Location: P. Terry’s
Burger: Better than average
Fries: Just the way I like ‘em
Parking: Disconcerting
Rating:

I will admit up front I made two mistakes. (Or, a single two-part mistake.) I got onions and jalapenos on it, something I rarely do. I like onions a lot, but primarily when they’re cooked in some way (preferably caramelized: I can eat caramelized onions out of the pan the way I eat popcorn out of a tub). I also like hot and spicy foods quite a bit. But today, it really just overwhelmed the burger, and I regretted it after a couple bites. I didn’t regret the meal. Don’t get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoyed it. But when the purpose was to actually test drive the burger itself, it was a bad choice.

The patty was thinner than I expected, although now I know why the prices are low. These weren’t monster, half-pound burgers. That said, the patties were still thicker than the very thin top bun. And the taste? Well, like I said. They tasted a LOT like onions and jalapenos. I think I’ll have to pay them another visit (or four) to do this right. For now, I’m giving it a 3.5, only because I did enjoy the Mighty Fine burger that much more.

Next week? It’s time to pay Hut’s a visit. (Though I have kept all your fine suggestions from prior weeks in a handy file. Keep ‘em comin’!)